Redesigning Tradition

Courts Service

While dealing with courts often subjects users to significant stress, smart UX design can play a transformative role by streamlining and humanising the legal process. In this exercise, I have explored ways to enhance the user experience of Ireland’s legal courts, aiming to make the process more accessible and user-friendly.
Download the Report
Lucid Board

Please keep in mind that this is not a real project but an exercise meant to illustrate my approach and process. I did not have access to real users, so instead of conducting actual interviews, I generated the source material using AI.

01. Research

Identifying & Grouping Stakeholders

In undertaking a UX design project aimed at addressing user issues within a system, it’s essential to identify and understand the various stakeholders involved. 

Mapping Stakeholders

Below is the stakeholder mapping for this project, categorizing stakeholders into four quadrants: Monitor, Keep Informed, Keep Satisfied, and Manage Closely.

Engagement Strategies

By identifying stakeholders and categorising them according to their power and interest, we can tailor our engagement strategies to meet their needs and expectations. This approach ensures that:

  • Influential stakeholders are actively involved.
  • Interested parties are kept informed.
  • Potential challenges are addressed proactively.

Understanding the User

As we design for the user, we need to get to know the user very well.

In our UX study, we began by selecting three key court users – an Applicant, a Witness, and a Victim – who reside in the “Keep Informed” quadrant of our stakeholder mapping due to their high interest but low power in influencing project decisions.

We initially drafted basic personas for each, outlining their demographics, backgrounds, technological proficiency, goals, frustrations, and specific needs from the court system.

Mapping User Journey

Mapping the user journey helps understand the full experience and pain points of users as they navigate legal processes. It reveals where users face challenges, enabling targeted solutions to improve clarity, reduce stress, and enhance accessibility.

This approach also helps prioritize enhancements, streamlining processes and making the system more user-friendly. By focusing on areas needing better support or simplified steps, designers can create solutions that make the judicial experience more efficient and less burdensome

Empathy Map

Creating an empathy map helps teams gain a deeper understanding of users’ emotions, thoughts, and behaviors throughout their journey. It captures how users feel, what they see, say, and do, which fosters empathy and guides the design of solutions that address real user needs.

By using an empathy map, designers can align on user perspectives, identify pain points and motivations, and develop user-centered solutions that improve experiences. It ensures the final product resonates with users on a personal level.

02. Analysis

Key Findings and Themes

Across all personas, several overarching themes and patterns emerged that highlight both common and unique experiences for court users.

Lack of Clarity and Information

Users often struggle to understand legal processes and terminology, leading to confusion about procedures, documents, and timelines. This lack of clear guidance can result in errors, delays, and a sense of being lost.

Stress and Anxiety

Court experiences are emotionally charged, and the complexity of legal procedures without accessible information increases stress. Users often feel overwhelmed and unprepared as they navigate their rights and appearances in court.

Need for Support and Guidance

Users expressed a strong desire for clearer instructions and personalized support throughout their journey. This highlights an opportunity for more empathetic, user-centered services to improve the overall experience.

Identifying Opportunities for Improvement

Based on the key findings, several opportunities exist to enhance the court experience for all personas. The research reveals that users of the Irish court system all share common pain points around stress, lack of information, and a need for support. Designing court systems with empathy and practical user-cantered solutions can significantly enhance the experience for all involved, ensuring that they feel informed, prepared, and supported throughout their legal journey.

Crafting Solutions: Implementing Best Practices from Other Jurisdictions

By adopting a user-centric approach and leveraging proven solutions from other judiciary systems, Ireland’s court system can address the core pain points faced by court users. Solutions such as simplified information access, enhanced support services, safe spaces for vulnerable users, and efficient scheduling and communication can significantly improve the user experience for applicants, witnesses, and victims.

Through these targeted interventions, the court system will not only provide a more efficient and transparent process but also foster a supportive environment that promotes user confidence, emotional well-being, and access to justice.

Problem:

Confusion and stress from lack of clear, user-friendly information on court procedures and requirements.

1. Solution: Simplified Information Resources

Reference: UK Online Family Court Information Hub – The UK has implemented comprehensive online information hubs specifically designed for family court users, offering plain-language guides, step-by-step instructions, and FAQs.

Proposed Solution for Ireland:

  • Develop a centralised online portal for each type of court case (family law, criminal cases, witness information) with easy-to-understand resources.
  • These resources would cover court processes, required documents, timelines, and step-by-step preparation, including visual aids and videos.
  • Example: Interactive guides tailored to specific case types (e.g., “Your Guide to Applying for Custody”), which include checklists, downloadable forms, and self-help tools.
Problem:
Users lack transparency on case status and timeline, causing anxiety and disruption.
2. Solution: Digital Case Management Portal

Reference: Singapore’s Integrated Electronic Litigation System (eLitigation) – Singapore’s eLitigation platform allows users to track their case progress, access documentation, and receive real-time updates on court schedules.

Proposed Solution for Ireland:

  • Implement a user-centric digital platform where applicants, witnesses, and victims can securely log in to view the progress of their case, check court dates, and receive personalised updates.
  • Features: Secure messaging with legal representatives or court staff, access to evidence files, and automated reminders for upcoming hearings or required actions.
  • Benefit: Improved transparency, reducing users’ anxiety and uncertainty about next steps.
Problem:

Users are overwhelmed by the complexity of court processes and require guidance.

3. Solution: Court Liaison/Navigator Services

Reference: New York City’s Court Navigator Program – New York courts implemented a Court Navigator Program that provides trained volunteers to assist unrepresented litigants, helping them prepare documents, understand proceedings, and navigate the court system.

Proposed Solution for Ireland:

  • Introduce Court Liaisons or Navigators in courthouses and online, trained to support applicants, witnesses, and victims by guiding them through paperwork, procedural requirements, and helping them prepare for court appearances.
  • Enhanced Support: Special training for navigating emotional cases, such as family disputes or criminal cases involving victims, ensuring that support is empathetic and user-centered.
  • Benefit: More informed and confident users, resulting in smoother proceedings and fewer administrative errors.
Problem:

Witnesses and victims are nervous about testifying, lack information on courtroom procedures, and are fearful of facing cross-examination.

4. Solution: Pre-Court Preparation Sessions

Reference: Canada’s Witness Preparation Programs – In Canada, pre-court preparation programs are offered to witnesses and victims to help them understand the court process, manage stress, and prepare for testimony.

Proposed Solution for Ireland:

  • Offer dedicated preparation sessions for witnesses and victims, either in person or online, to familiarise them with courtroom settings, legal questioning techniques, and their rights as witnesses.
  • Supportive Tools: Role-playing scenarios, informational videos, and interactive sessions to simulate giving evidence and being cross-examined.
  • Benefit: Increased confidence and reduced stress for witnesses and victims, ensuring they are prepared and able to give clear testimony.
Problem:
Victims and family law applicants face emotional trauma and anxiety in the court environment.
5. Solution: Safe Spaces and Emotional Support for Vulnerable Users

Reference: Australia’s Family Violence Courts – Australia has established special family violence courts that provide safe waiting areas for victims, separate from the accused, and access to support services such as counseling.

Proposed Solution for Ireland:

  • Establish secure, private waiting areas for vulnerable users, including victims and family law applicants, ensuring they do not encounter the opposing party before or after court proceedings.
  • On-site Support: Social workers, victim support specialists, and counsellors available on-site to provide emotional support before, during, and after the hearings.
  • Benefit: Enhanced safety and emotional well-being, reducing trauma and stress associated with the court process.
Problem:
Unpredictable and often lengthy timelines add to users’ stress and disrupt their lives.
6. Solution: Transparent Scheduling and Communication Improvements

Reference: Denmark’s Digital Court Schedules and Case Management – Denmark’s court system provides real-time access to court schedules, timelines for different case types, and automatic notifications for users.

Proposed Solution for Ireland:

  • Improve scheduling transparency by providing clear and accessible information on expected case timelines from filing to resolution.
  • Digital Notifications: Use SMS and email updates to notify users of schedule changes, required actions, or upcoming court dates, reducing unnecessary courthouse visits and missed deadlines.
  • Benefit: Reduced anxiety over unexpected delays, better ability to plan time off work or childcare, and greater trust in the court process.
Problem:
Users often lack follow-up support after the case concludes, which can affect their ability to process the outcome and move on.
7. Solution: Emotional and Legal Support Post-Trial

Reference: New Zealand’s Victim Support Services – In New Zealand, victims of crime have access to ongoing support services that assist with emotional recovery, navigating legal outcomes, and connecting with counseling.

Proposed Solution for Ireland:

  • Establish a follow-up service for vulnerable users, including victims of crime and family law applicants, providing them with guidance on post-trial procedures, counselling, and access to additional legal advice if needed.
  • Counseling and Peer Support Groups: Enable victims and family law users to access mental health resources and support groups where they can share experiences and receive emotional support.
  • Benefit: Improved well-being and sense of closure, helping users transition back to their daily lives after the court process.
Problem:
Long waiting periods, adjournments, and time-consuming court appearances disrupt users’ lives.
8. Solution: Hybrid Court Models for Efficiency

Reference: Estonia’s E-Court System – Estonia’s e-court system uses digital platforms to conduct hearings and resolve preliminary matters, significantly reducing in-person court time.

Proposed Solution for Ireland:

  • Implement a hybrid model for certain case types (e.g., procedural hearings, document submissions) using video conferencing and online document filing to minimize the need for physical court appearances.
  • Virtual Mediation and Hearings: Allow certain family law matters or preliminary hearings to be conducted virtually, enabling users to participate from home or their solicitor’s office.
  • Benefit: More efficient resolution of cases, reduced travel and waiting times, and greater convenience for court users.
03. Scoping

Recommendations for Next Steps

1. Prioritize Solutions Through Stakeholder Engagement

Engage all relevant stakeholders, including legal professionals and user representatives, to prioritize the proposed solutions. Use criteria such as feasibility, potential impact, and cost-effectiveness to determine the sequence of implementation.

2. Conduct User-Cantered Co-Design Workshops

Organize collaborative workshops with court users, designers, and stakeholders to co-create user-centred solutions. Employ methods like journey mapping, role-playing, and rapid prototyping to refine the design based on direct user input.

3. Develop and Test Prototypes

Create prototypes for key solutions, such as simplified legal documents, digital support interfaces, and enhanced communication tools. Test these prototypes with users from each target group to identify usability issues and gather feedback for improvement.

4. Scope Project for Implementation

Clearly define the scope of the project, including goals, deliverables, timelines, budget, and resource requirements. Develop a comprehensive project plan with assigned roles and responsibilities, and set success metrics to measure progress.

5. Pilot Testing and Continuous Feedback Loops

Roll out solutions on a small scale through pilot programs in selected courts. Monitor usage and gather real-time feedback from users and staff to identify challenges and areas for improvement. Use continuous feedback loops to make iterative enhancements.

6. Plan for Full-Scale Rollout

Based on pilot testing results, prepare for a broader rollout across the court system. Ensure proper training for staff and communication to all users about the new solutions. Develop user support materials (guides, FAQs) and provide access to help desks.

7. Establish Sustainable Improvement and Feedback Mechanisms

Implement mechanisms to gather ongoing user feedback through surveys, focus groups, and analytics. Set up an advisory board to regularly assess the effectiveness of the solutions and recommend further enhancements based on evolving needs.